Coming Full Circle

Hello! I am Lisa, Kathy's co-worker and guest blogger for this week.

I was not born in Medina County. I was born in Lake County, Ohio. My mother was born in Cuyahoga County and her father and grandmother were born in Sandusky County. Yet, I was given a wonderful surprise when I found out I had ancestor's who lived in Medina County before me.

My husband and I moved to Medina County in 1990 and I began doing family research in 1999. I was lucky enough to inherit a box of family heirlooms which included a stack of letters written to my great grandmother (on my mother's side), Sopha RHOADES SOLETHER. One of the letters was written by Sopha's 1st cousin, Ella RHOADES PUMPHREY.

Imagine my surprise when I learned that Sopha's father, my great, great grandfather, Gideon RHOADES lived in Medina County, Ohio, in 1856  and some of his siblings (and possibly him) sang on the steps of Medina's Old Court House during the "Fremont [Presidential] Campaign" in 1856!

But wait...there's more!


Along with the letter, Ella had included an ancestor chart for Sopha's father, grandfather and great grandfather.

This just fueled my desire to find out who lived here, where they lived, what they did and when did they leave?

I was lucky enough to have found a great deal of information on the RHOADES family when they lived in Sandusky County. The R.B. Hayes Library, in Fremont, Ohio, even had a box of photographs in a special collection.

Original photograph kept at the RB Hayes Library, Fremont, Ohio
 in the T.P. Hurd Collection

This is Elias RHOADES, Sr. and his wife Phebe (SAFFORD) RHOADES. These are my great, great, great grandparents.


They moved to Guilford Township, Medina County, Ohio around 1836. This is a photo taken in 1848, according to a note one of their daughters attached to it.



I also found a letter written by Elias' mother, Mary RHOADES, in regards to her widow's pension. It is dated 1837 and mentions Elias who is living in Guilford.

Elias is listed in the 1840 and 1850 U.S. Census in Guilford where he was a farmer. By 1860, Elias and Phebe are found listed in the U.S. Census in Clyde, Sandusky, Ohio, where they both died.

"The History of Medina County and Ohio", page 235

Elias' brother, Jesse RHOADES, came to Guilford before him. In "The History of Medina County and Ohio", Jesse is said to have moved to Guilford in 1830 and brought along H.G.Blake. Kathy did a Blog on H.G. Blake about a year ago. Mr. Blake was a very prominent resident in Medina and it's kind of cool that one of my relatives brought him here.


The Medina County land records show Jesse purchasing land in Guilford in the years 1831, 1832 (with his brother-in-law, James Harkness), 1835 & 1837.  I haven't been able to find any land records in connection with Elias, but I have a feeling he might have lived on one of these parcels of land.

According to the ancestral chart drawn up by cousin Ella, Elias and Phebe had 10 children. The oldest, Thomas, died in 1818. The 1850 census shows the couple having 8 children in the household and a possible son listed right below them.

The next child on the chart is Margaret. She married Abijah I. Wright, 18 November 1849 in Medina County. Margaret died in about 1852.



Elias, Jr. is the next child. According the 1850 U.S. Census, Elias, along with his brother Samuel, was a Daguerreotypist. A daguerreotype is an early type of photography. I have to wonder if he or Samuel took the photograph of their parent's that is shown above. By 1860, Elias is a farmer in Green Creek, Sandusky County, Ohio.

Original at RBHayes Library, T.P. Hurd Collection 

Then there is Jesse, most likely named after his uncle. He is not listed with the family in 1850. However, he did marry Lucinda HARRIS, 22 January 1847 in Medina County. I was unable to find him in the 1850 U.S. Census, but he shows up in the 1860 census in Hudson, Lenawee County, Michigan where he is listed as a carpenter.





Samuel is the next child. He was born in New York in 1826. His obituary tells of his life after coming to Ohio and gives us a better idea of the time when Elias RHOADES brought his family to Guilford.

Clyde Democrat, 29 Mar 1900, pg. 1

Gideon is the next child and my great, great grandfather. Gideon was born around 1828 in New York. He is also listed in the 1850 U.S. Census with Elias and is listed as a laborer. He is still living with Elias and Phebe in 1860 in Sandusky County and is now a carpenter. He didn't live with them long, on 12 July 1860 he married my great, great grandmother, Mary McMillen. His obituary, in the Clyde Democrat on 22 August 1901, also states that he came to Medina County in 1836. 

Mary RHOADES is one of those elusive ancestors. According to the chart she was born in 1830 and died in 1864. She is listed in the 1850 census with Elias and Phebe. However, those are the only two records I have been able to find. The chart shows she was married to a FOSTER, but the only RHOADES and FOSTER marriage I can find gives the wrong birth date for Mary and happens six years after her supposed death date. She is not listed with Elias and Phebe in the 1860 census and I have not been able to find her with anyone else or on her own.

RB Hayes Library. T.P. Hurd Collection

This is Phebe RHOADES MORGAN WOLVERTON CARTER. She was born around 1833 in New York. She is listed with Elias and Phebe in the 1850 census in Guilford. Three years later she marries Henry MORGAN on 19 Jan 1853 in Medina County. Phebe then marries Samuel WOLVERTON in 1859 in Sandusky County and then Joseph CARTER in 1866 in the same place.

RB Hayes Library. T.P. Hurd collection

James RHOADES was born around 1835 in New York. He must have been just a baby when the family moved to Guilford. This is cousin Ella's father and one of the "young folk" who sang on the court house steps. In 1860 he is with his parents and is employed as a clerk and by 1870 he has become a minister.

R.B. Hayes Library. T.P. Hurd Collection

Mariah RHOADES was the first of this family to be born in Ohio and most likely in Guilford in 1838. Mariah married Thaddeus Polk (T.P.) HURD in 1869. It is from his collection I was fortunate enough to find and make copies of all these photographs. 

Her brother, Charles, was also born in Medina County around 1840. Charles died young at the age of 21 in Sandusky County, Ohio. 

Another brother, Henry, who shows up on the 1850 census as being 2 years old, was also born in Medina County. He is not listed on the 1860 census with the RHOADES family and I have been unable to find any information on him. 

Elias, Sr. and Jesse RHOADES were not the only ones from their family to travel to Medina County. Their sister, Irene, married Solomon RHOADES (a possible cousin) and came with Elias' family in 1836. In 1850, they are listed in the census in Guilford surrounded by their children in nearby households. By 1854, Solomon and Irene and all of their children have moved to Outagamie County, Wisconsin where many of their descendants still live.

"Thirteen Wisconsin Families" John R. Rennert

"The History of Medina County and Ohio"

Polly, another sister to Elias & Jesse, married a James HARKNESS and traveled to Guilford Township in 1822. Polly died in 1833 and is buried in the Mound Hill Cemetery in Seville, next to her mother Mary. It seems that Polly was the first of my RHOADES ancestor's to come to Medina County. 

My RHOADES ancestors were here from 1822 to around 1858, almost 40 years. They lived on land that I have walked across and seen sites that I have seen. It may have taken 132 years but this line has come full circle. 

Thank you to Kathy Petras for allowing me to be her guest Blogger!  If there are any RHOADES still here in Medina County that may have some of the same ancestors, leave me a comment! 

Sources:

          Perrin, William Henry, History of Medina County and Ohio, containing a history of the state of Ohio, from its earliest settlement to the present time...(Chicago, Illinois; J. H., Baskin & Battey, 1881), 235 & 468.

     1840 U.S. Census, Medina County, Ohio, population schedule, Guilford Township, p. 214, line 12, Elias Rhoades; NARA micropublication M704, roll 412. 

   

     1850 U.S. Census, Medina County, Ohio, population schedule, Guilford Township, p. 292, dwelling 292, family 531, Elias Rhoades, Sr. household; NARA micropublication M432. 

     1860 U.S. Census, Lenawee County, Michigan, population schedule, Hudson, ED 150, dwelling 1197, family 1120, Jesse Rhoades household; NARA micropublication M653, roll 551.

     Medina County Record of deeds, 1818-1871; index to deeds 1790-1923, Medina County Recorders Office; volumes F, G, K, M & N; digital images, FamilySearch.org. 

     "Ohio County Marriages, 1789-2013," digital images, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, FamilySearch.org; Ohio County Courthouses. 

   

Reasonably Exhaustive Research

Hello again! It's me, Lisa Rienerth, Kathy is graciously giving me the opportunity to write another blog spot! She had to listen to me talk (and talk) about this confusing research and thought it might be a good lesson for all. 

The Board for Certification of Genealogists has a list of five elements that they use to judge research to be a fact. The first of these elements is "Reasonably Exhaustive Research".  This contributes to the credibility of the information and reduces the chances of future evidence contradicting the earlier results.

Many beginning family history researchers feel that if they find one source to back up their information, that is all they need. However, as I will show you, this can lead to years of false research. It is gravely important to search for every bit of evidence to substantiate your results.

Two other mistakes made during research is believing that the written word is correct, whether it is in book or digital form and using another persons research as a source. I can't stress enough that you must do your own research. Use the previous research as a stepping off place, but do not consider it proof. You must look at the original source and make your own decisions about the quality of it. Sometimes, you do not find the one source with the exact information you are looking for, but if you have done an exhaustive search, you should have enough proof to back up your results.

Let me show you an example of what can happen when using undocumented sources. My ancestor, Samuel Rhoades/Rhodes, was said to have been a Revolutionary Soldier. As I began my research I found a published source that listed my ancestor as having died in Sandy Hill, Washington County, New York, but that he was buried at Mound Hill Cemetery in Seville, Guilford Township, Medina County, Ohio. I do have sources that prove his wife, Mary Rhoades/Rhodes, is buried at this cemetery, but nothing I had said he was there beside her.

I obtained Samuel's pension record and it stated that he filed for his pension while living in Sandy Hill, Washington County, New York. The record goes on to say that he died on the 9th of February 1832, in Sandy Hill. It didn't say he was buried there.

The pension record also had a letter from Samuel stating that he desperately needed this money, due to the fact he broke his knee plate and was only surviving on the charity of his neighbors and the government.

After seeing this I couldn't help wonder if the family had the funds to bring Samuel's body to Ohio. For that matter, why would the family bring Samuel's body to Ohio in the first place? Washington County, New York is more than 540 miles from Medina County, Ohio. It was doable, but not probable.

I contacted the compiler of the information where I first found my ancestor listed as being buried in Medina County and asked if I could get a list of sources used to confirm Samuel's burial location.

The list of sources below were what was used to confirm his final resting place. 

1. DAR [Daughters of the American Revolution] Website: Ancestor #A096068

2. SAR [Sons of the American Revolution] Website: Patriot P277780

3. Abstract of Graves of Revolutionary Patriots, by Hatcher, Patricia Lee [Pioneer Heritage Press, Jun  1, 1987]

4. Official Roster of the soldiers of the American Revolution buried in Ohio, Vol II, page 292 [1938]

5. US Pension Records of Ohio 

6. NSDAR [National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution]  Lineage Book, Vol 91,    (1912), page 88

7.  Revolutionary War Pension W4319

The records found on the DAR and SAR websites do not include sources and I do not feel comfortable accepting genealogical research without sources.

I found the listing of Samuel in the Official Roster of the soldiers of the American Revolution buried in Ohio, Vol II, (1938) page 292 and the NSDAR Lineage Book, Vol 91, (1912), page 88. Which is shown below:

RHOADES, SAMUEL, Medina co [Official Roster of Soldiers...]

Pvt May 1775. 8 mo under Capt Seth Ballard Jan 1776; 12 mo under Samuel Parsons

Sept 1777; 4 mo under Harvey Sept 1777; May 1778 2 mo under David Shay.

In battles of Forge Point and Saratoga. B 9-25-1753 at Stoughtingham Mass; Son of

Samuel and AbigaU (Thorp) Rhoades; mar Mary Morse 11-21-1773 at Walpole Mass;

chldr: Jabez; Polly; Ireney; Andrew; Francis; Samuel; Jesse; Elias. Soldr d 2-9-1832

at Guilfard (later called SevUle) Medina co O. Bur at Seville O. In 1850 cem replatted.

Inscrpt on monument of yvife "Mary, wife of Samuel Rhodes, died Nov 21 1837 ae 81 yr 5 mo 7 da." A sunken grave adjoining with a 15 ft pine tree growing where stone would be is thot to be grave of Samuel. Ref No. 196473 D A R. Rept by Jonathan

Dayton chpt, Dayton O

MRS. IDA SUTLIFF LESHER. 90268 [NSDAR Lineage Book]

Born in Lansing, Mich.

Wife of William Rose Lesher.

Descendant of Samuel Rhodes, as follows:

1. Charles H. Sutliff (1843-1907) m. 1868 Eliza M. Rhoades (b. 1848).

2. Jesse Rhoades (1824-98) m. 1847 Lucinda Harris (1828-1906).

3. Elias Rhoades (1794-1874) m. Phebe Safford (1798-1870).

4. Samuel Rhoades m. 1773 Mary Morse (1756-1838).

Samuel Rhoades (1758- 1832) served as private, 1775-78, under Cap

tains Seth Ballard, Samuel Parsons and Daniel Shay. He was

engaged in battles of Frogs Point and Saratoga. He was born in

Norfolk County, Mass. ; died in Seville, Ohio.

Two pieces of information stand out to me in these listings. 

The listing in the book of Revolutionary Soldiers buried in Ohio states "A sunken grave adjoining with a 15 ft pine tree growing where stone would be is thot to be grave of Samuel." This listing looked familiar to me. When my mother died I inherited some family papers and in those papers was a letter to my great grandmother from her cousin. The letter was dated 1931 and spoke of her visit to the "Seville Cemetery" looking for grave sites. To quote the letter "I pushed aside some of the B.B. [Bouncing Betties, Flowers] to read from old stone - I saw this: Mary, wife of Samuel Rhoades died Nov 21 1831 ages 81 yrs. 5 mos. 7 da. I looked for the other stone - for there was space which indicated the other grave, but the pine tree was growing exactly where the stone would naturally have been placed.......I hope it may be duly recognized as other graves are being  marked thru the courtesy of the Sons Organization & also the Daughters of the Revolution." It is almost word for word of what was stated in the 1938 listing.

I then checked an earlier volume of The Official Roster of the Soldiers of the American Revolution Buried in the State of Ohio (1929)  and Samuel was not listed. Note the dates of the two resources. In 1929 Samuel was not listed as being buried in Ohio, yet in 1938 he was listed. The letter written to my great grandmother was in 1931 and the same wordage is used to describe his possible burial in Ohio in the 1938 volume. Did my great grandmother's cousin use this information for her application for a Revolutionary War marker? Is this where the idea of Samuel being buried next to his wife started?

The NSDAR listing has one blatant error and that is that Samuel died in Seville, Ohio. I have several sources stating that he died in Kingsbury, New York. Neither of these books included sources and with these errors I don't trust the listings.

A piece of information that added to the confusion was the U.S. Pension Records of Ohio showed Mary Rhoades' pension payments commencing 4 Mar 1831 and coming from the bank in Cincinnati. Why would she be receiving pension payments when Samuel was still alive? And why from Ohio, if she is still suppose to be in New York? Was Samuel in Ohio while she was receiving the pension?

 I went through the pension records once again and found a few records that address this issue. I found a letter written by the attorney for the "heirs of Mary Rhoades". He asked why Mary hadn't  received her payments from March 1831 to Feb 1832. The statement he received back was that the bank's notes stated that they were not to begin until 9 Feb 1832. 

"The instruction from the Commissioner of Pensions to the pension agency now (The Franklin Bank) direct payments in this case from the 9th of Feby 1832"

The pension papers also included this pension slip that shows Mary Rhodes receiving $80 to commence 10 Feb '32. 

 

And this slip: 

                                                                                                                                                                                The top part can be a little confusing due to the lack of punctuation. It looks like Samuel Rhoades was of Medina County in the state of Ohio. However, it is actually saying: Mary Rhodes is Samuel's wife, Samuel died on the 9th of February 1832 and Mary Rhodes is of Medina County, Ohio.                                                                                                                          In the second section, outlined in red, the number 4 and the month of March are crossed out and replaced with the number 9 and the month of February. The year 1831 was over written with 1832.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

There had to be an error recording the date Mary was eligible for her pension payments. The bank's notation about starting the payments on the 9 of Feb 1832 and the changed date on the pension slip lead me to believe that Mary did not receive her widow's pension money until she was actually a widow. 

I also found some land records for Samuel Rhoades in Washington County, New York. One record shows him selling land to his two sons, Elias and Jesse. It then states that Samuel comes to record this record 6 days before his death on the 3 February 1832. 

With all I have found so far I have more than enough proof that Samuel Rhoades died in Sandy Hill, Washington County, New York, but I don't have solid proof that he was buried there. 

I was then lucky enough to be taking a family trip out to Salt Lake City, Utah, where the Family History Library is located. I was thrilled! I searched the online catalog and found that they had cemetery transcription records for Washington County, New York. When I arrived at the library I was able to pull the transcriptions and found the listing I have been looking for. It listed Samuel Rhoades as being buried in the Moss Road Cemetery in Washington County, New York. Samuel is listed on the eighth line down.

 Now, as I have been saying, I can't rely on this transcription to be correct. I need to see the grave. I have requested a photograph be taken for me on Findagrave.

So, my exhaustive search is not over. I am in the process of contacting the sexton for the Mound Hill Cemetery to see if maybe she has any additional information on Samuel's burial. I am also researching the town of Kingsbury, New York to see who might have the Moss Street Cemetery records.

 However, at this point, by using the land records, the pension records and the cemetery transcription, I think it is probable that he is buried in Washington County, New York. Too many assumptions were made early on in this research and those assumptions were then taken as fact and perpetuated throughout the years. Why no one thought to search for a grave site for Samuel in the town that he died is a mystery.